Stop being a data janitor.

Your analysts should be finding growth opportunities, not fixing timezone errors or debugging why two reports don't match.

Defining 'Net Revenue' differently in every report
Writing spaghetti SQL to join GA4 and Shopify
Cleaning the same bad data every week
Analyst burnout from constant data janitorial work

Three layers of transformation quality

Cleaning, transformation, and enrichment each solve a different problem.

Data cleaning

Focuses on data quality: removing what doesn't belong and standardizing the rest.

  • Merging fields from Shopify, ad platforms, and analytics into one consistent structure
  • Fixing timezone mismatches so reports are not off by hours
  • Catching bad data automatically with 2,500+ daily quality checks

Data transformation

Focuses on usability: converting raw data into tables your team can actually work with.

  • Business-ready tables for dashboards and recurring analysis
  • Building-block tables for data teams who want to customize
  • Aggregated rollups for executive reporting and daily KPIs

Data enrichment

Focuses on completeness: filling in the gaps that raw data leaves behind.

  • Product costs mapped at the SKU level so you can calculate real margins
  • Channel and sub-channel groupings tailored to how your team thinks about marketing
  • Marketing attribution stitched across multiple tracking sources (up to ~30% more coverage vs GA4 alone)

Attribution (including last-click, multi-touch, and survey-based models) is part of the enrichment layer. See how attribution works

Data tables by use case

Start with dashboards and reports. Go deeper only if your team needs to.

What you need What we provide
Dashboards + recurring analysis Business-ready tables, pre-joined so your dashboards just work. Start here.
Executive reporting + daily KPIs Aggregated rollups optimized for high-level dashboards and board reporting.
Custom analysis + segmentation Tables for filtering and segmenting by product, geography, channel, and more.
Advanced modeling + data science Raw event and transaction data for teams building custom analyses.

Most teams only need the first two rows. Data teams who want full control can go deeper. The building blocks are there. See the dashboards

Buy vs. build options

Three common alternatives, and the trade-offs of each.

Building in-house

Full control, but you own every definition, test, and pipeline.

  • Typical ramp: 6-12 months to reach stable, board-ready metrics.
Read comparison

Modern data stack (Fivetran + dbt + warehouse)

Maximum flexibility, but you assemble and maintain every piece.

  • Works well if you already have a data team and strong dbt practice.
Read comparison

DIY dbt foundation

Strong for hands-on teams, but operating ownership stays with you.

  • Who maintains definitions + tests when sources change?
  • What breaks when your ecommerce platform ships an update?
  • How long until you reach board-ready numbers?

Quality and consistency controls

  • Documented and consistently named fields so teams can query without translation work.
  • Designed to stay stable as source schemas evolve, reducing dashboard breakage.
  • 2,500+ automated quality checks run daily to catch drift before it reaches reporting.

Practical outcomes

  • Consistent metric logic across dashboards, warehouse queries, and AI workflows.
  • Reduces 'Meta says X / Shopify says Y' gaps by applying a documented attribution hierarchy and reconciling sources.
  • Lower analyst rework from definition drift and ad-hoc field cleanup.

Ready to stop debating the numbers?

Get started

Tell us a bit about your brand and stack—we’ll follow up shortly.